ATO urges caution with SMSF property investments

The ATO has warned trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to be cautious when investing in property.

The ATO is concerned that people are using their SMSFs to invest in property without fully understanding their obligations under the law, or that some people are seeking to take advantage of certain types of arrangements.

The ATO is primarily concerned with arrangements where:

  • an SMSF invests in a related unit trust by acquiring units in the trust, and the unit trust acquires property, but the arrangement breaches the superannuation compliance rules in some way, such as where the property is subjected to a mortgage, or is acquired from or rented to a related party, when it would otherwise be prohibited; and
  •  an SMSF enters into a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA) to acquire an asset, and the arrangement does not comply with the strict conditions that must be met for SMSFs that borrow.

In particular, these borrowings must generally be used to acquire a single asset (that the fund is not otherwise prohibited from acquiring; e.g., SMSFs are prohibited from acquiring residential property from a related party), and the asset acquired cannot be held directly by the SMSF but must be held by a separate ‘holding trustee’ (or ‘custodian’), solely for the benefit of the SMSF.

The ATO has also stated that:

  • the trustee of the holding trust must be in existence, and the holding trust must be established, by the time the contract to acquire the asset is signed; and
  • the SMSF cannot borrow to acquire a vacant block of land and then use the same borrowing to construct a house on the land.

According to the ATO:

“The fine details are important and trustees need to be sure that property is the right investment for their SMSF and that the arrangement is legal.”

“Some of these arrangements, if structured incorrectly, cannot simply be restructured or rectified.  The only option may be to unwind the arrangement which could involve forced sale of assets at an inconvenient time.  This could be very expensive for the fund with potential stamp duty and tax consequences.”

SMSFs that do not comply with the superannuation laws may also become ‘non-complying’ for tax purposes and, if the SMSF or the unit trust needs to dispose of the relevant property, they may incur a CGT liability, or the SMSF (and any other unitholders) may be required to include a capital gain in their assessable income if they need to redeem their units in the unit trust.

In addition, the ATO states that where arrangements are deliberately entered into to get around the law, the fund’s trustees may be disqualified, face civil penalties or even face criminal charges.

Managing Risk through Online Terms of Use

The Web 2.0 era is characterised by the fundamental shift in how people interact with information. No longer does information flow in one direction – opportunities now exist for the consumer of information services to contribute, provide feed back, criticise, or determine if the content is newsworthy. This high level of interaction is typically considered to be positive.

However, as with anything, when engaging in such activities you should be mindful of the potential risks that come along with it – and this is doubly true for hosts of content or webmasters. In addition to considering if content is potentially defamatory, or libellous, one must also consider issues such as copyright, privacy, and control.

If you are a webmaster or a service provider or some sort, these risks can often be managed by a combination of:

  • having a clear and effective Terms of Use;
  • actively policing your user base for breaches of the terms; and
  • having policies in place on dealing with complaints.

In addition to being able to assist in managing your risks, by having clear and effective Terms of Use, you are able to manage your users more effectively. Note that just having a Terms of Use may not be sufficient to protect you – your risk management strategy should consist of both legal and non-legal measures. In addition to this, a Terms of Use has to be effective towards whatever service you are providing. There is no point in going with a standard Terms of Use if the terms contained within are not particular to the type of service that you provide.

While you can draft a Terms of Use by yourself, it is always advised that you should seek legal advice in doing so. A solicitor can identify issues that you may not have previously considered and can generally add value to the entire process.